The Challenge

Where it started.

Pella needed competitive insight into window hardware cost-performance across leading platforms. Internal cost models lacked teardown-level resolution.

SPEND DEPLOYED $16M total spend
CSC Approach

What we did.

Conducted competitive product teardowns and benchmarking across leading window platforms. Identified design, manufacturing, and cost-performance advantages. Built cost models for roll forming and hardware sub-systems.

01 Diagnose Should-cost · Teardown 02 Source Supplier network · RFQ 03 Implement Negotiation · APQP · PO
The Outcome

Result.

$3.2M saved (20–21%) on $16M of hardware spend. Pella's design and procurement teams now share a common cost-driver framework for ongoing product decisions.

SAVINGS DELIVERED $3.2M on $16M spend SPEND 21% reduction
More cases

Related work.

Your case next

Send 5 parts. We share in the savings — not in the upfront cost.

Book a discovery call →